Austin is classified here as person. This public reference has been located and classified, but its substantive orientation, bibliography, comparisons, criticisms, and corpus-specific assessment remain assigned research.
Austin appears in the named lineage for the Semiotic lens. The placement identifies inherited intellectual vocabulary; it does not make the reference evidence of conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, or moral success.
J. L. Austin's distinction among what an utterance says, the act it performs under social conditions, and the effects that require uptake is included in the philosophical lineage for Language as revisable making because that public reading uses it to frame the stated stakes. It remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, or motive.
J. L. Austin's distinction between saying and doing with words under contextual conditions of uptake and authority is included in the philosophical lineage for Creative work is not automatic confession because that public reading uses it to frame the stated stakes. It remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, or motive.
J. L. Austin's speech-act distinctions and conditions of uptake appears in the focused review of Language as Incantation and the Deaths of Becoming to name an interpretive comparison or vocabulary.
J. L. Austin's speech acts and their contextual conditions appears in the focused review of Poetics of Productive Emptiness to name an interpretive comparison or vocabulary.
Austin appears in the combined philosophical lineage for The same intellectual material redeployed across registers because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Austin appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Iteration as ground state — revising rather than finishing because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Austin is named in this shipped through-line reading because the reading borrows a specific intellectual comparison.
The present entry does not yet offer a developed reading of:
A public citation has not yet been added.
A public citation has not yet been added.