All 42 questions the Baseline intake can ask, one at a time, in the
wording a reader meets and the order the answers appear. Approve it or deny it, add a note if
the note is the point, and copy the whole verdict out at the end.
Independence ← Transparency
attachment<-disclosure
When you and a partner tell each other everything, does that pull your lives together, or is it what lets you keep your own?
then: How much does telling everything change how merged you get?
-
0.85
Telling each other everything is what buys me my own life.
-
0.45
Nothing is hidden, so nobody needs to keep tabs on anybody
-
-0.45
The more we tell each other, the more our lives run together
-
-0.85
For me, knowing everything about someone and being merged with them are the same thing
-
0
Telling doesn't decide how combined we are
basis Reis & Shaver's interpersonal process model: self-disclosure plus perceived partner responsiveness produces intimacy, which is interdependence. Disclosure pulling toward union is well supported.
Independence ← Transience
attachment<-duration
Your lease is up and moving in together is on the table: is merging your life with somebody easier when you feel like it's secure long term?
then: How much does forever change how merged you get?
-
0.85
I'd only merge if it were for good. That comes first, not after.
-
0.45
Merging comes easier when it feels like it's for good. The longer it feels, the more I share.
-
-0.45
Merging comes harder as it gets permanent. I keep parts of my life to myself.
-
-0.85
The moment it's for good is when I start protecting what's mine
-
0
How merged I get has nothing to do with how long it lasts
Independence ← Polylove
attachment<-love
If you loved more than one person, would you keep more of your life your own, or does that not come into it?
then: How much does loving more than one change how merged you get?
-
0.85
You can't merge everything and love widely. One of them has to give.
-
0.45
Loving more than one keeps my life more my own. Split that way, it never fully pools.
-
-0.45
Loving widely makes me want one home to come back to
-
-0.85
The wider it goes, the more I need one life that is clearly shared
-
0
Who I love doesn't set how merged I get
Independence ← Openness
attachment<-openness
If new people can come in, do you still share the account, the calendar and the spare key, or keep more of your life your own?
then: How much does an open door change how merged you get?
-
0.85
If others are possible I wouldn't pool everything. The separate parts are the point.
-
0.45
If new people can come in, I keep more of my life my own
-
-0.45
Who else is around doesn't touch the lease. I'd merge just the same.
-
-0.85
If others can come in, the shared ground has to be more solid, not less
-
0
Who's welcome doesn't set how combined we are
Independence ← Polysex
attachment<-sexuality
If you slept with other people, would you hold more of your life back from a partner, or would that change nothing?
then: How much does sex elsewhere change how merged you get?
-
0.85
Sleeping with others and keeping part of my life to myself are one thing
-
0.45
If others are in the picture, I hold something back at home
-
-0.45
It makes me want a home with a partner that isn't up for negotiation
-
-0.85
Anything outside only works if the main thing is fully shared, with no doubt about it
-
0
Sex has never set how merged I get
Independence ← Improvisation
attachment<-structure
Do you and a partner merge money, homes and plans once you've agreed it, or do you drift into them?
then: How much does agreeing it first change how merged you get?
-
0.85
The good version happens before anyone names it. Agreeing to merge turns it into a deal.
-
0.45
Money, homes and plans are things you drift into rather than agree
-
-0.45
Money, homes and plans get merged once we've agreed it. You say it out loud first.
-
-0.85
I'd never merge anything on assumption. That's how people end up stuck.
-
0
Planning doesn't change how merged we get
Transparency ← Independence
disclosure<-attachment
After sharing a home with a partner long enough that the small things stopped getting mentioned, does keeping your own life mean keeping your own counsel too?
then: How much does keeping your own life change what you'd say?
-
0.85
A life I have to file reports on isn't my own. If I keep the life, I keep the details.
-
0.45
If I live it on my own, I get to decide what to say about it
-
-0.45
Living apart makes me over-explain, not under-explain
-
-0.85
The more distance there is, the more I explain, in detail, unasked
-
0
How merged we are doesn't set what I say
basis Attachment avoidance predicts lower self-disclosure and reluctance to build interdependence (Moors et al. 2015; intimacy-avoidance literature), so keeping your own life predicting keeping your own counsel is the supported direction.
Transparency ← Transience
disclosure<-duration
As the years go by with the same person, do you tell them more, or quietly let more go?
then: How much do the years change what you'd say?
-
0.85
It all comes out eventually. A long thing can't run on half a picture.
-
0.45
I'd tell them more. Years earn the whole picture.
-
-0.45
I'd let more go. You stop reporting what will pass on its own.
-
-0.85
A long life together runs on tact as much as on truth, and I let a great deal go
-
0
How long it runs doesn't change what I tell
Transparency ← Polylove
disclosure<-love
If you started having feelings for someone, would you tell a partner sooner than anything else, or hold it back longer?
then: How much do feelings change what you'd say?
-
0.85
A feeling gets said the moment I notice it. One I'm hiding is already the problem.
-
0.45
I'd rather say it too early than sit on it
-
-0.45
I'd hold it back longer. I'd want to understand it before handing it over.
-
-0.85
What I feel is the last territory that is only mine, and I don't hand it over
-
0
Feelings don't change what I share either way
Transparency ← Openness
disclosure<-openness
Once there's someone new in the picture, do you tell a partner more, or is that where you start holding back?
then: How much does a new person change what you'd say?
-
0.85
Once someone new is around, it all gets said. An open door you keep quiet about isn't open.
-
0.45
Another person in the picture raises the stakes, so I talk more
-
-0.45
Another person in the picture is where I start leaving things out
-
-0.85
Once someone else is involved I go quiet. Their privacy isn't mine to spend.
-
0
A new person doesn't change what I share
Transparency ← Polysex
disclosure<-sexuality
If you slept with someone else, would that be the first thing you'd tell a partner, or the last thing you'd volunteer?
then: How much does it being sex change what you'd say?
-
0.85
Sex is the one thing I'd say straight away. Sitting on it is the real betrayal.
-
0.45
I'd rather say it badly than have it found out later
-
-0.45
Sex is the last thing I'd volunteer — it's the most private thing I have
-
-0.85
I'd never volunteer it. That's the part I'd keep whatever else I shared.
-
0
Whether it's sexual doesn't change what I'd say
Transparency ← Improvisation
disclosure<-structure
If something happens that no rule between you and a partner covers, do you go by what you agreed to tell each other, or by what the moment asks?
then: How closely does what you tell follow what was agreed?
-
0.85
I go on what the moment calls for. Rules about honesty feel like paperwork.
-
0.45
What I tell follows whatever the moment asks — I read the room, not the rules
-
-0.45
What I tell follows what we agreed — that's what agreeing it was for
-
-0.85
I say exactly what we agreed to say. Improvising honesty is how people get hurt.
-
0
I'd say the same things with or without an agreement
Transience ← Independence
duration<-attachment
If you and a partner keep separate lives, does that make it less likely to last, or does it not matter?
then: How much does merging decide how long you'd last?
-
0.85
Merging is how people commit. A separate life is a relationship keeping its options open.
-
0.45
If we keep separate lives, I doubt it lasts
-
-0.45
It makes no difference. I've shared everything with people it wasn't forever with.
-
-0.85
Every merged one of mine ended. The ones that stayed separate are the ones still here.
-
0
How combined we are doesn't set how long we last
Transience ← Transparency
duration<-disclosure
If you told a partner everything, would that make it last longer, or do the long ones need some things left unsaid?
then: How much does honesty decide how long you'd last?
-
0.85
I couldn't build decades on half a picture. Full honesty is the condition.
-
0.45
Full honesty makes a thing last. Nothing hidden, nothing to rot.
-
-0.45
Decades run on tact. You learn to leave some things alone.
-
-0.85
Nothing lasts decades of being told everything. A long thing needs what goes unsaid.
-
0
What we tell doesn't set how long we last
Transience ← Polylove
contested
duration<-love
If you loved more than one person, would you expect that to last less long, or is that a separate question?
then: How much does that tell you how long it'll last?
-
0.85
Loving more than one and lasting forever are promises I can't hold at once
-
0.45
If I love more than one, I doubt it lasts. Something gives eventually.
-
-0.45
Loving more than one has nothing to do with it. One-person relationships end all the time.
-
-0.85
Narrowing it down to one is what has ended things for me, not what sustained them
-
0
How many I love has never predicted how long it lasts
basis Same meta-analysis. No evidence that loving more than one person shortens relationships.
Transience ← Openness
contested
duration<-openness
You're booking something a year out: does being open to new people make that feel less settled, or has that got nothing to do with it?
then: How much does being open decide how long you'd last?
-
0.85
Open and temporary are the same question for me
-
0.45
An open relationship feels temporary to me, like nothing has been decided yet
-
-0.45
Open relationships last as long as closed ones. That isn't what decides it.
-
-0.85
Nothing has lasted for me except the open ones. Closing it is what kills them.
-
0
Who's welcome doesn't set how long we last
basis Same meta-analysis. Openness does not predict shorter relationships.
Transience ← Polysex
contested
duration<-sexuality
When you see a couple sleeping with other people, does that look temporary to you, or say nothing about how long they'll last?
then: How much does that tell you how long they'll last?
-
0.85
Keeping it to one person is the signal. It's how I know what something actually is.
-
0.45
Sleeping with others reads as temporary to me
-
-0.45
Openness takes the pressure off, and pressure is what ends things
-
-0.85
Every exclusive relationship I've had came with an expiry date. The open ones didn't.
-
0
Sleeping with others tells me nothing about how long it'll last
basis A 2025 meta-analysis (35 studies, 24,489 participants) found no difference in relationship quality, satisfaction or longevity between consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships. Any belief that non-exclusivity shortens a relationship is a personal reading, not a finding.
Transience ← Improvisation
duration<-structure
You and a partner have never actually said out loud what you are to each other: does that make it temporary, or are the unspoken ones the ones that last?
then: How much does saying it out loud decide how long you'd last?
-
0.85
If nobody has said it out loud, nobody has committed to it
-
0.45
If nobody says what it is, it's temporary. The lasting ones get said out loud.
-
-0.45
Unwritten is the most permanent kind. The moment it's on paper it stops being that.
-
-0.85
The ones that needed rules are the ones that ended. The lasting ones were never written down.
-
0
Agreed or not doesn't set how long we last
Polylove ← Independence
love<-attachment
When you keep your own life separate from a partner's, does that leave more of you free to love someone else, or less?
then: How much does keeping your own life change it?
-
0.85
The space a separate life leaves is what makes loving more than one possible
-
0.45
Keeping my own life leaves more of me free, and what's free can go somewhere
-
-0.45
Keeping my own life is tiring enough without splitting this too
-
-0.85
If everything else is separate, love is the one thing I want undivided
-
0
How merged we are doesn't govern who I love
Polylove ← Transparency
love<-disclosure
Saying out loud that you're falling for someone — does that give it room, or take the air out?
then: How much does saying it change it?
-
0.85
Naming a feeling is what makes it real enough to happen at all
-
0.45
Saying it out loud gives it room — named, it's allowed to exist
-
-0.45
Saying it takes the air out — once spoken it becomes a thing to manage
-
-0.85
Saying it kills it. Once it's named it stops being a feeling and turns into a negotiation.
-
0
What I say and what I feel don't govern each other
Polylove ← Transience
love<-duration
When a partner says forever and means it, does forever ask you to be each other's only, or can a lasting thing carry more than a passing one?
then: How much does forever decide it?
-
0.85
Forever and being the only one are the same promise to me
-
0.45
Something built to last asks to be the only one
-
-0.45
A lasting thing can carry more than a passing one. It's the fragile ones that can't.
-
-0.85
Only something secure could hold it. Anything shakier would break under the weight.
-
0
How long something lasts says nothing about how many I love
Polylove ← Openness
love<-openness
If you'd welcome someone new, does that include falling for them, or stop short of it?
then: How far does that welcome reach?
-
0.85
For me, letting someone in and loving them are the same act
-
0.45
It includes falling for them. I don't know how to welcome someone halfway.
-
-0.45
It stops short. New people gladly, falling for them no.
-
-0.85
I can welcome anyone easily, because that part was never on offer
-
0
Who's around has never decided who I love
Polylove ← Polysex
contested
love<-sexuality
Something physical with someone else has been going on a while — in your experience, does feeling tend to arrive with it?
then: How reliably does sex carry feeling with it?
-
0.85
I have never managed to keep sex and feeling apart for long
-
0.45
Feeling has arrived with it more often than I'd have predicted
-
-0.45
The more physical it stays, the less it tends to go anywhere
-
-0.85
Sex is how I keep something from becoming more. It's a wall, not a door.
-
0
Sex has never told me anything about love
basis Sexual and romantic exclusivity are separable dimensions (Fern's emotional x sexual exclusivity matrix; open relationships vs polyamory vs swinging differ exactly here), so this coupling genuinely varies by person.
Polylove ← Improvisation
love<-structure
Could you agree with a partner beforehand about falling for someone else, or does that just happen when it happens?
then: How much of this could you agree beforehand?
-
0.85
This never arrives on cue, and thinking you can agree it beforehand is the mistake
-
0.45
You can't arrange it beforehand. Feelings don't take instructions.
-
-0.45
It has to be agreed first. Otherwise it's a breach, whatever it felt like.
-
-0.85
Feelings are the last thing I'd leave unspoken. This gets said before anything else.
-
0
What we agreed doesn't reach as far as who I love
Openness ← Independence
openness<-attachment
When you keep your own life separate, does that make room for someone new, or is that unconnected?
then: How much does keeping your own life decide who you'd let in?
-
0.85
There's room for someone new because I never gave up my own life
-
0.45
I have time and space that isn't spoken for, so someone new can fit
-
-0.45
A separate life doesn't open the door. I'd keep my own and still let no one in.
-
-0.85
A separate life is already full. There's nowhere left to put anyone new.
-
0
How merged we are doesn't decide who gets in
basis As above: avoidance predicts willingness but not engagement. Direction supported at the attitude level, contested at the behavioural one.
Openness ← Transparency
openness<-disclosure
Would you let someone new in only if you'd hear everything, or does hearing about it not come into it?
then: How much does hearing about it decide who you'd let in?
-
0.85
No account, no door. Hearing all of it isn't a preference, it's the price.
-
0.45
I'd only let someone new in if I heard everything. Telling me is the price of entry.
-
-0.45
Hearing about it doesn't come into it — I'd rather not have the play-by-play
-
-0.85
If I had to hear all of it, that's what would close the door
-
0
How much I hear doesn't set who's welcome
Openness ← Transience
contested
openness<-duration
If you knew a relationship wouldn't last forever, would that leave more room for other people, or less?
then: How much does how long it lasts decide who you'd let in?
-
0.85
Forever is what shuts everyone else out. That's what it's for.
-
0.45
If it's temporary there's more room for other people. There's less to protect.
-
-0.45
I can risk the company when I'm certain. When it's temporary I can't.
-
-0.85
I could only do this from somewhere solid. If I'm unsure, the door shuts.
-
0
How long it lasts doesn't decide who comes in
basis No evidence either way that a long horizon closes a relationship to newcomers; this is a personal model rather than a finding.
Openness ← Polylove
openness<-love
When a partner asks whether you could ever love someone else too, does loving one person shut that door, or can it stay open?
then: How much does loving one person decide who you'd let in?
-
0.85
One love, one picture. That's the whole of what open or closed means to me.
-
0.45
Once I love someone, I stop looking for anyone else
-
-0.45
It can stay open — someone new can matter without competing
-
-0.85
I can make room for someone else because I'm sure of one person
-
0
How I love doesn't set who can come in
Openness ← Polysex
openness<-sexuality
If you and a partner opened things up sexually, would that open the whole relationship, or stay one thing on its own?
then: How much does keeping sex to one person decide it?
-
0.85
Keeping sex to one person and keeping everyone out are one question for me, not two
-
0.45
Sex with other people opens the whole thing. One brings the other.
-
-0.45
Sex with other people is its own thing. That can be open while the rest stays closed.
-
-0.85
That being open is why nothing else is. It uses up the whole allowance.
-
0
Sex with others doesn't decide who else is around
Openness ← Improvisation
openness<-structure
Does someone new become possible once you've agreed it with a partner, or does agreeing it first make the whole idea cold?
then: How much does agreeing it first decide who you'd let in?
-
0.85
You can't agree to a person before you've met them. Real ones don't work that way.
-
0.45
Agreeing it first makes the whole idea cold. You can't negotiate a person.
-
-0.45
Someone new becomes possible once we've agreed it. That's what makes it a real option.
-
-0.85
Unagreed, nothing is open — it's just unguarded, and I wouldn't call that a door
-
0
What's been agreed doesn't decide who's welcome
Polysex ← Independence
sexuality<-attachment
When you keep more of your life to yourself, does that leave more room for sex with someone else, or less?
then: How much does keeping your own life decide it?
-
0.85
I keep my own life largely so that stays open to me
-
0.45
A life more my own leaves more room for it — my weekends, my call
-
-0.45
The more separate everything else is, the more I want that one thing shared
-
-0.85
If we share nothing else, sex has to be the thing that is only ours
-
0
How separate our lives are doesn't touch what I want sexually
basis Attachment avoidance predicts more positive attitudes toward and willingness to engage in CNM (Moors, Conley, Edelstein & Chopik 2015) — though the same study found avoidant people were LESS likely to actually engage, so treat magnitude with care.
Polysex ← Transparency
sexuality<-disclosure
There's real chemistry with a coworker, or a friend of a friend — if you told a partner, would that make room for it, or shut it down?
then: How far does telling carry it?
-
0.85
If I can say it out loud, it can happen. If I can't, it can't.
-
0.45
Telling a partner makes room for it — what's said out loud gets lighter
-
-0.45
Telling shuts it down — once it's said it's real, and real raises the stakes
-
-0.85
Saying it is how it dies. Once it's out I have to choose, and I choose what I have.
-
0
What I tell and what I want don't really touch
Polysex ← Transience
sexuality<-duration
When a relationship feels like it has an end date, do you find sex with other people easier to picture, or harder?
then: How much does an end date decide it?
-
0.85
If something is for good, that is what makes it exclusive. A short thing doesn't ask for that.
-
0.45
Something temporary makes it more thinkable — an end date asks less of me
-
-0.45
A short thing has less room for other people, not more
-
-0.85
A short thing I want whole and only mine. The long ones can hold more.
-
0
How long it lasts and what I want sexually run on separate tracks
Polysex ← Polylove
contested
sexuality<-love
A friendship keeps deepening and it isn't only attraction — is sex easier because you feel something, or easier when you don't?
then: How far does the feeling carry it?
-
0.85
Feeling is the only way in for me — without it nothing happens at all
-
0.45
I need to feel something first. Without that I'm not interested.
-
-0.45
It's simpler without feeling. The moment I care I start protecting something.
-
-0.85
Caring about someone ends it — once I do, I stop wanting that with anyone else
-
0
Feelings and sex have never had much to do with each other for me
basis As above — separable dimensions.
Polysex ← Openness
sexuality<-openness
When you're glad to have someone new in your life, does sex come with that, or is it a separate question?
then: How much does welcoming someone decide it?
-
0.85
Welcome and sex are the same door here — that is what welcome means
-
0.45
Sex comes with it. Welcoming someone doesn't stop politely at the bedroom door.
-
-0.45
Sex is a separate question, and the answer is no. That's why they're welcome.
-
-0.85
New people are only safe here because that is permanently off the table
-
0
Who's welcome and what happens with them are unrelated for me
Polysex ← Improvisation
sexuality<-structure
Would you want sex with someone else agreed with a partner beforehand, or is that the part you'd leave unplanned?
then: How much does agreeing it beforehand decide it?
-
0.85
It only ever happens unplanned. Once it's negotiated it isn't the same thing.
-
0.45
I'd leave it unplanned. Arranging it beforehand takes the life out of it.
-
-0.45
I'd want it agreed first. If it was never said, it isn't really allowed.
-
-0.85
I'd never let this happen unspoken. It's the first thing I'd want agreed.
-
0
Whether we agreed anything beforehand doesn't come into it
Improvisation ← Independence
structure<-attachment
If you and a partner keep separate lives, does that need fewer things agreed, or more?
then: How much do separate lives change what you'd agree?
-
0.85
Separate lives need almost nothing agreed — that's most of the appeal
-
0.45
The less we share, the less there is to sort out
-
-0.45
Separate lives need more agreed. That's where assumptions go wrong.
-
-0.85
Nothing shared means nothing can be assumed, so all of it has to be said out loud
-
0
How merged we are doesn't set how much we spell out
Improvisation ← Transparency
structure<-disclosure
If you and a partner tell each other everything anyway, do you still need it agreed?
then: How much does telling replace agreeing?
-
0.85
Rules are what you reach for when you can't just talk to each other
-
0.45
If it all gets said anyway, the telling is the agreement
-
-0.45
The more we share, the more I want it actually agreed
-
-0.85
Everything said and nothing agreed is the worst combination there is
-
0
Saying everything and agreeing everything are separate needs for me
Improvisation ← Transience
structure<-duration
If you and a partner knew it had an end date, would that need less spelled out, or exactly as much?
then: How much does an end date change what you'd agree?
-
0.85
The paperwork is for the forever version. A season needs none of it.
-
0.45
A thing with an end date needs less spelled out. You don't draw up rules for a season.
-
-0.45
A thing with an end date needs it spelled out just as much. Short things go wrong faster.
-
-0.85
A short thing has no time to recover from a misunderstanding, so more gets said, not less
-
0
How long it runs doesn't change what gets agreed
Improvisation ← Polylove
structure<-love
Do feelings make you want the ground rules with a partner clearer, or prove no rule was ever going to hold?
then: How much do feelings change what you'd agree?
-
0.85
Every agreement I made about feelings broke the moment it mattered
-
0.45
Feelings prove the rules won't hold. A rule can govern what I do, never what I feel.
-
-0.45
Feelings make me want the ground rules clearer. That's exactly when you need footing.
-
-0.85
Feelings are where I most want it all said out loud. Nothing here gets left to reading the room.
-
0
Feelings don't change how spelled-out I want things
Improvisation ← Openness
structure<-openness
There's actually someone new, not just the idea of someone — do ground rules come first, or does it get worked out as you go?
then: How much does a new person change what you'd agree?
-
0.85
Rules written for someone you haven't met are guesses. This gets worked out as it happens.
-
0.45
No two people are alike, so I'd rather take it case by case
-
-0.45
With someone new the ground rules come first — that's the moment you most want them
-
-0.85
Nothing here gets improvised. A new person is when it all gets said out loud.
-
0
A new person doesn't change how much gets agreed
basis CNM research is consistent that opening a relationship involves MORE explicit negotiated agreements than monogamous defaults, not improvisation. This sign was reversed until 2026-08-10.
Improvisation ← Polysex
structure<-sexuality
When it's sex with someone else, do you want ground rules with a partner, or resent having them?
then: How much does it being sex change what you'd agree?
-
0.85
None of this should be pre-agreed. Wanting someone you had to get clearance for isn't wanting them.
-
0.45
I resent the terms when sex is involved — pre-negotiating it drains what it is
-
-0.45
I reach for the rules when sex is involved. This is what gets said out loud first.
-
-0.85
Sex is the one thing I'd never improvise. It gets settled before anything happens.
-
0
Whether it's sexual doesn't change how much I plan
basis Same body of work: sexual arrangements are the part most often made explicit in CNM agreements.