Foucault is classified here as person. This public reference has been located and classified, but its substantive orientation, bibliography, comparisons, criticisms, and corpus-specific assessment remain assigned research.
Foucault appears in the named lineage for the Critical-theory / power-analytic lens. The placement identifies inherited intellectual vocabulary; it does not make the reference evidence of conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, or moral success.
Foucauldian analysis of interpretive power appears in the focused review of TASSELS-DEEP to name an interpretive comparison or vocabulary.
Foucauldian power analysis of categories, normalization, and the interpreting apparatus is included in the philosophical lineage for Depth stays answerable to the artifact because that public reading uses it to frame the stated stakes. It remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, or motive.
Foucault's power-knowledge as a way to examine category authority and the protective function of veto is included in the philosophical lineage for Machine interpretation remains answerable because that public reading uses it to frame the stated stakes. It remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, or motive.
Foucault's technologies of the self as a way to examine both the enabling and normalizing power of structured self-inquiry is included in the philosophical lineage for Profiles remain question maps because that public reading uses it to frame the stated stakes. It remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, or motive.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Frame-correction over self-defence because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Frame-correction over self-defence because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Frame-correction over self-defence because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Calibration language over characterological language because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Calibration language over characterological language because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Architecture protects relationships, rather than perception management because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Iteration as ground state — revising rather than finishing because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault appears in the combined philosophical lineage for Iteration as ground state — revising rather than finishing because one or more linked public claims use it to frame their stakes. The lineage remains interpretation and cannot establish conduct, value, trait, diagnosis, identity, motive, authorship, recurrence, or moral success.
Foucault is named in this shipped through-line reading because the reading borrows a specific intellectual comparison.
The present entry does not yet offer a developed reading of:
A public citation has not yet been added.
A public citation has not yet been added.